Panels Are Getting a Makeover!

photo credit: Megan Parks

After many long years, NSF is retiring IPS (Interactive Panel System) and replacing it with our brand-new Proposal Evaluation System (PES). You can’t outrun Y2K forever!

You’ll receive updated sign-in instructions in your charge letter to help you navigate to the new system. You’ll be given a quick start guide with screen shots and helpful instructions before your next panel. If you simply cannot wait to preview the new system, check out the cool video here which walks you through the PES capabilities.

The new system for panel summary crafting and approval will look and feel a lot more like other systems you use for group editing and tracking changes. The scribe will be able to accept changes from fellow panelists and you won’t have to navigate between multiple tabs to read and review comments from your fellow panelists. It’s going to be great, and we think you’ll really love it! The future is here!

Finally, if you’re interested in serving on a review panel, please check out this page, select the division most aligned with your expertise, and add your name to the sign-up sheet.

Design Video Games, Win Fabulous Prizes!

photo credit: Ryan Quintal via unsplash

Do you know any K-12 students and passionate teachers or parents who would love to mentor the next generation in video game design? Then we have a bussin’ opportunity for you, Gen Alpha. Bet!

That’s correct! We in DEB (who are not old) are excited to share NSF’s Game Maker Awards. Contestants develop and design video games based on the theme “Life in 2100” and are eligible to win thousands of dollars in cash prizes. So, come flex!

The eligibility rules can be found here and be sure and register to join us for a webinar September 10th at 2pm Eastern where we’ll explain the contest and answer any questions you may have.

The vibe is definitely not mid no matter how sus you find this blog. We are, in fact, snatched. Periodt.

New DCL: Strengthening the Evidence Base Related to Broadening the Participation of LGBTQI+ Individuals in STEM

This DCL aims to advance NSF’s Vision of a “nation that leads the world in science and engineering research and innovation, to the benefit of all, without barriers to participation”, which is closely aligned with the NSF 2022-2026 Strategic Plan and the Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) Data Action Plan. NSF is fully committed to the development of a future-focused science and engineering workforce that draws on the talents of all Americans, including those in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI+) communities.

This DCL encourages four proposal types:

  1. Proposals for fundamental, use-inspired, and/or translational research and/or research syntheses. Proposed projects may involve the collection and analysis of new and/or existing data, meta-syntheses, meta-analyses, and/or structured literature reviews. Project topics may include, but are not limited to:
    • Research-informed practices for the collection, management, and dissemination of SOGI data, while attending to privacy and confidentiality, as up-to-date and comprehensive SOGI data are essential to pursue effective pathways to build capacity in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) enterprises.
    • Research methods for examining and mitigating disparate impacts of key computing technologies, including effects arising from fairness in algorithms from artificial intelligence/machine learning to mechanism design; personal representation in systems including authentication, virtual reality, and social media; and privacy and security risks that might arise for individuals in applications that use sensing, user modeling, and personalization.
    • Research on organizational change around systemic and cultural factors, expanding capacity and/or supporting initiatives for systemic change, and organizational policies and practices impacting researchers and students.
    • Educational, social, and behavioral science research related to gender identity and sexual orientation, language use within and across STEM communities, and/or the impact of intersectional identities on experiences in STEM.
    • Novel theoretical and analytical frameworks, methodologies, and research questions informed by evidence related to LGBTQI+ individuals in STEM.
  2. Proposals to design and deliver new conferences, colloquia, and workshops focused on research that advances education and workforce development activities related to building and/or applying the evidence base related to SOGI.
  3. Group travel proposals to support participation in existing or planned meetings and conferences aligned with the goals of this DCL.
  4. Proposals to fund activities aligned with the goals of this DCL and associated with increasing access, engagement, inclusion, and/or belonging in STEM research, workforce development, and education. For example, proposals for Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) supplementsREU sites, and Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) supplements may focus on such activities and investigators with active NSF awards may request supplemental support for such activities.

When developing proposals submitted in response to this DCL, proposers are strongly encouraged to integrate evidence related to factors affecting the participation of LGBTQI+ individuals in STEM. Proposal data management and sharing plans should address issues of privacy and sensitive data, as appropriate. Well-considered recruitment and outreach plans and robust strategies to support the well-being of participants are strongly encouraged.

A proposal responsive to this DCL should be submitted to the NSF program(s) relevant to the proposal’s content. Proposers are strongly encouraged to discuss proposal concepts with program directors in the relevant program(s) before submission, or to contact lgbtqi-dcl@nsf.gov. Supplemental funding requests should be submitted only after approval by the relevant NSF program director for the original award. Proposals responding to this DCL should be prepared and submitted following the guidance in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) and must adhere to the requirements and guidance specified in the program solicitation, announcement, or program description to which the proposal will be submitted, including deadlines, where applicable. Final funding decisions are subject to the availability of funds and the intellectual merit and proposed broader impacts of proposals received.

Submissions should include “LGBTQI+ DCL:” at the beginning of the proposal title or immediately following any solicitation specific title prefix.

8/12/24 Virtual Office Hours Recap: Graduate Research Fellowship Program

The Division of Environmental Biology (DEB) held its latest Virtual Office Hour on August 12, 2024. DEB Program Officers were joined by our colleagues with the Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP). We host these office hours 1-2pm EST on the 2nd Monday of every month. There is a designated theme each time, but attendees are welcome to ask about other NSF-related topics. Program Officers (POs) from different research areas are present at each Virtual Office Hour, so a wide range of scientific perspectives is represented.

The presentation and other documents are available here:

Slides (PDF)

Recording

Transcript

The question-and-answer portion starts at time stamp 38:19.

Please reach out to a PO if you have any questions about the proposal submission and review process in DEB programs. You can review  5 tips on working with Program Officers as part of the NSF 101 series on our Science Matters blog to prepare.

Check out the upcoming office hour topics below and be sure to check back here or on the NSF Events Page for information on how to register. Our next Virtual Office Hour will be on October 21st from 1pm-2pm Eastern Time. Please note that is a date change from our regular schedule. We will be discussing Dear Colleague Letters and how they are different from Solicitations and how that may influence your research project.

Upcoming Office Hours and Topics:    

October 21*: Dear Colleague Letters

December 9: TBD *indicates change of date from regular schedule

Upcoming Virtual Office Hours:  Graduate Research Fellowship Program

Join us Monday, August 12th, 1 – 2pm ET for DEB’s next Virtual Office Hour: Graduate Research Fellowship Program. DEB Program Officers will be joined by our colleagues with the Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP). This event is suitable for students looking to apply to the GRFP as well as faculty interested in becoming a reviewer for the program. Upcoming DEB Virtual Office Hours are announced ahead of time on DEBrief, so we suggest you also sign up for blog notifications.   

REGISTER HERE TO PARTICIPATE

If you can’t make it to this or any future office hours, don’t worry! Come back to the blog afterwards, as we post recaps and the presentation slides of all office hour sessions. Alternatively, visit our Office Hours homepage for slideshows and recaps of past topics.    

Virtual Office Hours are on the second Monday of every other month from 1 – 2pm ET. 

Upcoming Office Hours and Topics:                    

August 12: Graduate Research Fellowship Program

October 21: Dear Colleague Letters

December 9: TBD

VOH Recap: Biodiversity on a Changing Planet (BoCP) 

The BoCP program hosted a Virtual Office Hours July 8th to discuss the program and answer questions from community members. If you were unable to attend, here are some of the questions asked during the Q & A section:

How do you define Functional Biodiversity?

We realize that functional biodiversity has been defined many ways. In the context of the BoCP solicitation, Functional biodiversity refers to the numerous roles of traits, organisms, species, communities, and ecosystem processes in natural systems. Functional biodiversity also includes the roles of emergent properties and processes across all levels of biological organization. We emphasize that successful BoCP proposals will integrate evolutionary and ecological aspects of functional biodiversity (please see the solicitation-specific criteria in the solicitation).

Does “a changing planet” mean specifically climate related changes (i.e., warming, changes in precipitation), or will proposals that look at human management choices or land use change also fit the idea of changing planet?

In the context of the BoCP solicitation, environmental change includes, but is not limited to, climate change.

Do you have to submit a Design Track before an Implementation Track proposal?

No, you do not. If your project team and ideas are sufficiently developed you may directly submit to the Implementation Track.

Are there limits on the activities of the Design grants? Specifically, can much of the Design grant budget fund data collection (going beyond meetings and collecting preliminary or “proof-of-concept” data)?

Design proposals are aimed at building new teams with no prior collaborative history and must combine specific team-building activities over the three years of the project with the development of creative research and technical approaches that start to address critical, but perhaps untested, novel, or high-risk aspects of functional diversity and biodiversity dynamics in the context of changing environmental conditions.

Are there any differences in required components between design track and the implementation (e.g. review of SAIF plan, project management and mentoring plans etc.) or are they identical?

There is no difference in the required documents. For Design track proposals, the project description must describe how building a new team is combined with the development of creative research and technical approaches that start to address critical, but perhaps untested, novel, or high-risk aspects of the functional axes of biodiversity. Successful Design track proposals will articulate how the team formation includes diverse perspectives and approaches, collaboration, and coordination strategies. For Implementation track proposals, the project description must describe how the proposed research has a high potential to engender substantial research advances in understanding functional biodiversity on a changing planet, and clearly articulate a compelling vision of advances beyond existing efforts.

What is typical size of an Implementation Track Budget?

As with our Core programs, we encourage PIs to request the budget they need to successfully complete the project. The budget should be carefully and clearly justified to make the relationship between the scope of the work and the size of the budget as clear as possible.  

Can you have partnerships involving more than one of the formal international partners or collaborators that are not from countries represented by one of the international partners?

Yes. Multilateral collaborative proposals, involving NSF and more than one international partner among NSFC, FAPESP, and NRF will also be considered.

The agreements with the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) of Brazil, and the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa do not preclude other international collaborations (see solicitation for additional details). Do note, for proposals that include funding to an International Branch Campus of a U.S. Institute of Higher Education or to a foreign organization or foreign individual (including through use of a subaward or consultant arrangement), the proposer must provide the requisite explanation/justification in the project description.

If you have a collaboration with one of the formal international partners, does the research necessarily have to take place in those countries?

Proposals including partnerships with the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) of Brazil, and the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa must meet the eligibility requirements of those organizations. There is no specific requirement that projects including international partners take place in those countries.

For the international collaboration, do the collaborating funding agencies (e.g., National Natural Science Foundation of China) review the proposals separately or are they obligated to fund if the proposal succeeds at NSF?

In each case, the NSF submission must be mirrored by a proposal submitted to the partner agency. We strongly encourage the international PIs to confer with the international program officer(s) on the documentation needed for the international submission prior to the international agency’s submission deadline.

As I understand it, the NSF’s BoCP solicitation document says that the NRF-South African submission should be exactly the same as the NSF submission, is this correct?

Yes, for US-South Africa joint research projects, an identical scientific research project description must be submitted to NSF by the U.S. researcher, and to NRF by the South African collaborator(s). The proposal budget submitted to NSF should include only the costs of U.S. participants; the anticipated budget for South African participants should be submitted as a supplementary document.

What is a SAIF plan and when is it required?

All proposals submitted to this solicitation that include research that will be conducted off-campus or off-site must submit a Safe and Inclusive Fieldwork (SAIF) Plan as a supplemental document that will be considered under the broader impacts review criterion. Off-campus or off-site research is defined as data/information/samples being collected off-campus or off-site, such as fieldwork and research activities on vessels and aircraft. A more detailed description of the SAIF Plan is in the BoCP solicitation: https://new.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/biodiversity-changing-planet-bocp/nsf24-574/solicitation#prep and further information on SAIF plans can be found at https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2023/nsf23071/nsf23071.jsp.

Can proposal teams include Senior Personnel from international institutions that has an adjunct position at a U.S. institution? Could post-docs apply these projects as CO-PIs?

This would be up to the institution at which the adjunct or postdoctoral appointment is held.

Is postdoc/graduate student mentoring plan required?

Any proposal that requests funding to support postdoctoral scholars or graduate students must include a Mentoring Plan. See https://new.nsf.gov/policies/pappg/24-1/ch-2-proposal-preparation#ch2D2i-i for more details.

Can one be a co-PI on one proposal and a PI on a second application?

Yes. There are no restrictions or limits on the number of proposals per organization or the number of proposals per PI or co-PI.

Panel Service: What to Expect

Are you curious about serving on a panel, but something has stopped you? Maybe you’re waiting for a program officer to track you down or are secretly relieved when prior commitments always seem to fall on panel dates. Or (worst of all!) you’ve allowed that dreaded imposter syndrome to outpace your enthusiasm.

Have no fear! Let’s take a moment to go over who (and how) we typically recruit panelists, what you can expect leading up to the panel, what happens on the actual meeting days, and why panel service could be beneficial to you.

Who serves on panels?

Panelists range in experience from post-doctoral scholars through the ranks to tenured faculty. They also include museum curators and researchers, and research-focused federal employees outside of NSF. This means you need a PhD and must be active in your field.

Recruitment

Program officers review the content of each proposal and recruit panelists who are qualified to review the slate of proposals in a given panel. This can explain why you may be recruited for some panels and not others. We try our best to build diverse panels, with broad representation of men and women, career stages, types of institution (Research-1, colleges, and minority-serving), states (especially EPSCoR jurisdictions), and membership in underrepresented groups. (With respect to the latter, we rely on you to self-identify when you register with Research.gov.)

To gear up for panel recruitment/service, it is good to serve initially as an ad hoc reviewer (i.e., reviewing a single proposal but not attending the panel meeting) and to have submitted a proposal (no matter its outcome) as PI or Co-PI so that you are familiar with the process.

You can also relay your interest in serving by visiting our website and signing up using our Reviewer Survey. We also collect suggestions for potential reviewers from other panelists and have sign-up sheets at Evolution and ESA meetings.

Before Panel Service

So, you’ve agreed to serve on a panel*. That’s great! You’ll receive an email (a “Charge Letter”), directing you how to register for the panel, make travel and lodging arrangements, and plan for any technological or special accommodations.

After lots of communication from the managing Program Officer, and each panelist identifying their conflicts of interests, you’ll be given your review assignments – usually 4-6 weeks prior to the panel dates.

Next, you’ll write your individual reviews for 8-10 proposals evaluating the intellectual merit and broader impacts. These individual reviews are completed before the panel starts. We recommend that reviews be submitted 3 to 5 days ahead of the panel so that everyone — program officers and other panelists — has the chance to ponder the complete set of opinions on each proposal.

*Please note that if you have a proposal currently under review in DEB, you cannot serve as a panelist during this funding cycle. This also means that if you agree to serve on a panel, please don’t then submit a proposal to DEB.

Day of Service

The panel is a multi-day discussion of the intellectual merits and broader impacts of a set of ~30-50 proposals. A panel may be in person at NSF, virtual, or hybrid. For each proposal in a DEB panel, at least two other panelists will provide reviews. You and your fellow panelists will discuss each proposal, come to a consensus, and then make a recommendation about its overall quality to NSF. It’s important to understand that the panel’s recommendations are just that — recommendations. NSF program officers always take them to heart but their ultimate decisions on which proposals to fund involve additional considerations, most notably what we call “portfolio balance”.

How does serving on a panel serve you?

  1. You can ask about upcoming funding opportunities and recent (or future) programmatic changes at the Q&A session with DEB senior leadership and representatives from the BIO Directorate Office of the Assistant Director.  You can also suggest ways to improve the review processes to better serve our community of investigators.
  2. You gain insight into new and emergent science in your field.
  3. You learn about grantsmanship.
  4. You learn about the merit review process.
  5. You build networks of scientists working on similar projects with similar goals.
  6. It’s intellectually stimulating. We guarantee you’ll be pushed in new directions.

Closing Note

Even though we build diverse panels, there are simply not enough panel service opportunities for everyone to get a chance serve on panel each year, To get this experience, we encourage you to look broadly for ad hoc review and panel service opportunities anywhere at the NSF (e.g., GRFP), and to look out for “mock panels run by NSF at Society Meetings (typically targeted towards early career folks like postdocs).  Thanks for reading this long post!

Virtual Office Hour: Biological Research and Tribal Nations

Learn more about new requirements in the PAPPG for how researchers interact with tribal nations

A change to the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG, NSF 24-1), which went into effect on May 20, 2024, alters the requirements for proposals and awards that impact the resources or interests of one or more of the 574 federally recognized American Indian or Alaska Native Tribal Nations (see Chapter II.E.10).

To help inform the community about these changes and their potential impacts on biological sciences research, the NSF Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) will hold a Virtual Office Hour on July 23, 2024 from 2:00 to 3:00 pm ET. Register in advance for this VOH session.

BIO staff will be joined by staff from NSF’s Policy Office, Office of the Director, and Directorate for STEM Education to outline the new requirements.

All members of the biological sciences community should feel welcome to attend as the session will attempt to cover the impact on a variety of biological subdisciplines. Individuals from outside the biological sciences are also welcome.

The event will be recorded and a recording will be posted here shortly after the event.

What is research that impacts Tribal Nations?

Examples of such activities may include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • research or projects that involve Tribal Nation members and would invoke the Tribal Nation in any way (including but not limited to referencing a Tribal Nation in materials, public forums, or publications);
  • carrying out studies or research on Tribal Nation reservations, territories, and other locations where Tribal Nations have legally protected rights to resources or to engage in activities; and
  • using Tribal Nation-controlled information or data in research

Upcoming Virtual Office Hours:  Biodiversity on a Changing Planet (BoCP) 

The BoCP program is a cross-directorate and international program led by NSF that invites submission of interdisciplinary proposals addressing grand challenges in biodiversity science within the context of unprecedented environmental change, including climate change.  

The program supports both US-only collaborative proposals and proposals with international partnerships with the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) of Brazil, and the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa. 

Successful BoCP proposals will test novel hypotheses about functional biodiversity and its connections to shifting biodiversity on a changing planet, with respect to both how environmental change affects taxonomic and functional biodiversity, as well as how the resulting functional biodiversity across lineages feeds back on the environment. 

Join us Monday, July 8th,  noon-1pm ET to learn about the BoCP program.  

Register in advance for this webinar: 

https://nsf.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_Z9_68QaETNODaRieGYX7Wg