Writing Budget Justifications

A Budget Justification is the narrative that accompanies your budget and can be up to five pages in length. This is where investigators validate and explain the dollar amounts they requested in their line-item budget. Justifications explain pay rates, duties of personnel, time commitments, materials and supplies, and other things necessary to complete the proposed work.

While writing your Budget Justification, you should ensure you are answering these questions:

  1. Why are the requested funds needed?
  2. How does each item in the budget help meet the proposed deliverables?
  3. How were these requested funds estimated?

As always when preparing a proposal, it’s important to follow guidance in the PAPPG. In addition to the details provided there, here are general pieces of advice to write the best Budget Justification:

Use Parallel Formatting with the Budget template

You can easily organize and format your Budget Justification using the same letter and number system used in the budget template. This also helps your Program Officer locate specific items and amounts.

Using Senior Personnel as an example, your budget template will look something like this:

Then, your budget justification should follow this order:

A. Senior Personnel

  1. Pomona Sprout- Principal Investigator, # months work/year, list specific responsibilities and explain how she arrived at this calculation. Year 1 $$$$, Year 2 $$$$, Year 3 $$$$, Year 4 $$$$
  2. Indiana Jones- Co-Principal Investigator, # months work/year, list specific responsibilities and explain how he arrived at this calculation. Year 1 $$$$, Year 2 $$$$, Year 3 $$$$, Year 4 $$$$
  3. Budgeting Salaries: Time and Rates

For all personnel, show what amounts you are asking for and state how you calculated those salary amounts. If you are not requesting salary, you can provide a brief explanation of why. Give a monthly breakdown and include any fringe rates. If you are requesting more than two months of salary for any senior personnel, provide clear rationale. Some commonly seen exemptions include that the person has a soft money position or that the project scope requires buying out of teaching time (as might be the case at an undergraduate institution). Also keep in mind that the two-months of salary for an individual is counted across all NSF awards that person is associated with.

Avoid common mistakes in Section G. Other Direct Costs

Section G is often where confusion happens. The best way to avoid confusion is to start in the PAPPG, which clearly defines which costs should live in lines G1-G6. Some key points to keep in mind:

  • Section G.1 (Materials and Supplies): Materials and Supplies that will be used by students or trainees listed under Participant Support Costs can be (but are not required to be) included in G.1, allowing for the application of indirect costs.
  • Section G.3 (Consultant Services)If you are using the consultant category, the PAPPG requires information about each individual’s expertise, primary organizational affiliation, normal daily compensation rate, and number of days of expected service. You can include consultant travel cost, but will need to justify them.
  • Section G.5 (Subawards): For each subaward, a budget and budget narrative need to be prepared and submitted. Please make sure that the subaward budgets list the subawardee institution and PI (and not the information of the lead institution and PI again).
  • Section G.6 (Other Direct Costs – Other): This is a catch-all category that will always attract scrutiny, so especially for this section be sure to be explicit about what you’re requesting, why, and how much it will cost.
  • Graduate student tuition goes in G.6. Other.

Double check the indirect-cost (overhead) rates

If most of your work is off-campus, check with your Authorized Organizational Representative about whether the off-campus indirect cost rate applies. Different institutions have different policies on when the off-campus rate is appropriate and sometimes Sponsored Research Offices simply assume that all work is on-campus.  Because the off-campus rate is typically about half of the on-campus rate, it will make a big difference in your requested budget.

In Conclusion

Justify everything. Assume nothing. If necessary, clarify the NSF budget guidelines with your Authorized Organizational Representative prior to submitting a proposal. This is especially important for rare or unusual expenditures, such as foreign subawards or consultancies or salary requests beyond two months for any senior personnel. It’s also important for normal expenditures like travel.

For example, don’t just write, “I need $8,000 for international travel to go to two meetings in Europe.” Use an airfare estimator and show the breakdown of costs.

Again, make sure your Program Officer will be able to understand how you came up with the total number you’re requesting in each category. There’s no harm in adding a table to show calculations. And this may seem obvious, but make sure the numbers in the budget justification match the numbers in the budget. You can also check out our past Virtual Office Hours for more information.

Don’t miss this one! Important webinar on updates in the NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) (NSF 24-1 effective date May 20, 2024) 

Check out this post from our friends over in IOS here or in full below:

There are a number of important changes that will likely impact most submissions to NSF in the updated NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) (NSF 24-1), which will apply to all proposals submitted or due on or after May 20, 2024.  

We recommend that PIs and their Sponsored Projects Offices attend the upcoming NSF Policy Outreach Webinar on Tuesday, March 12, 2024, from 2:00 – 3:00 pm EST.  

Register here: https://nsfpolicyoutreach.com/2024-pappg-webinar/  

To find out more about the changes in this new version of the PAPPG, we also suggest that prospective proposers read the Summary of Changes here: https://new.nsf.gov/policies/pappg/24-1/summary-changes  

Virtual Office Hours for IntBIO, LIFE and NSF-DBT India

Join the Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (MCB) for their next virtual office hour. On Wednesday, March 13th from 2-3pm ET, the topic will be Special Funding Opportunities (including IntBIO, LIFE, and NSF-DBT India).  Program Officers will host a live Q&A to answer your questions.

Please register here.

DEB Releases New Core Solicitation

The DEB Core is back, baby! NSF 24-543 is ready to receive your proposals (with a few minor updates and revisions). So, what’s new?

  • The Small Grants category has been replaced by STAR Grants with a maximum budget of $400,000 and a reduced page limit (10 pages).
  • This solicitation expands the categories of research experience educational activities that can be requested in the proposal submission to include Research Experiences for Post-Baccalaureate Students (REPS).
  • A Safe and Inclusive Fieldwork (SAIF) Plan is still required but you can now follow the submission instructions in the Core Programs solicitation under “additional proposal preparation instructions” instead of being directed to the PAPPG.

As a reminder, the Core Programs Solicitation supports research by our four clusters (Ecosystem Science, Evolutionary Processes, Population and Community Ecology, and Systematics and Biodiversity Science) and any inquiries as to where your research fits best should be directed to the Program Officers within those clusters. For other general submission questions, feel free to email debquestions@nsf.gov.

Upcoming Virtual Office Hours:  The Civic Innovation Challenge (CIVIC)

Join us Monday, March 11th, 1 – 2pm ET for DEB’s next Virtual Office Hour: The Civic Innovation Challenge. The Civic Innovation Challenge (CIVIC) is a research and action competition that accelerates the transition to practice of foundational research and emerging technologies into communities through civic-engaged research. Upcoming DEB Virtual Office Hours are announced ahead of time on DEBrief, so we suggest you also sign up for blog notifications.  

REGISTER HERE TO PARTICIPATE

If you can’t make it to this or any future office hours, don’t worry! Come back to the blog afterwards, as we post recaps and the presentation slides of all office hour sessions. Alternatively, visit our Office Hours homepage for slideshows and recaps of past topics.   

Virtual Office Hours are on the second Monday of every month from 1 – 2pm ET.

Upcoming Office Hours and Topics:                   

March 11: The Civic Innovation Challenge (CIVIC)

April 8: Opportunities for broadening the STEM community

May 13: CAREER Solicitation

June 10: Merit Review and How to Get Involved with NSF

Webinar for Sustainable Regional Systems Research Networks (SRS RNs)

Sustainable regional systems are connected urban and rural systems that are transforming their structures and processes collaboratively with the goal of measurably and equitably advancing the well-being of people and the planet. The purpose of the SRS RNs competition is to develop and support interdisciplinary, multi-organizational teams working collaboratively to produce cutting-edge convergent research, education, and outreach that addresses grand challenges in sustainable regional systems. 

Join the webinar to learn more on Tuesday, March 5, 2024 from 2:00pm to 3:00pm EST.

Full proposals are due May 15th, 2024.

2/12/24 Virtual Office Hours Recap – Opportunities for freshwater and marine environmental research

The Division of Environmental Biology (DEB) held its latest Virtual Office Hour on February 12th. Representatives from DEB, the Division of Ocean Sciences, and the Division of Earth Sciences  focused on funding opportunities for freshwater and marine environmental research. See below for the slides  and a recording.  

We host these office hours 1-2pm EST on the 2nd Monday of every month. There is a designated theme each time, but attendees are welcome to ask about other NSF-related topics. We try our hardest to host Program Officers from different programs at each Virtual Office Hour, so a wide range of scientific perspectives are represented.

The presentation and other documents are available here:

Slides (PDF)

PAPPG 23-1 – Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide

Recording of Office Hour

Transcript

_________________________

Please reach out to a Program Officer if you have any questions about the proposal submission and review process in DEB programs. NSF has suggested 5 tips on working with Program Officers as part of the NSF 101 series on our Science Matters blog.

Check out the upcoming office hour topics below and be sure to check back here or on the NSF Events Page for information on how to register. Our next Virtual Office Hour, on March 11th from 1pm-2pm Eastern Time, will focus on translating foundational research and emerging technologies into communities through civic-engaged research (CIVIC).

___________________________

Upcoming Office Hours and Topics:                   

March 11: Translating foundational research and emerging technologies into communities through civic-engaged research (CIVIC)

April 8: Opportunities for broadening the STEM community

May 13: CAREER Solicitation

June 10: Merit Review and How to Get Involved with NSF

Civic Innovation Challenge (CIVIC) Funding Opportunity

The CIVIC Innovation Challenge (CIVIC), a research and action competition driven by community priorities, solicitation is now available. There are two tracks, with Track A, “Climate and Environmental Instability – Building Resilient Communities through Co-Design, Adaption, and Mitigation”, perhaps being most relevant to DEB investigators. Track B focuses on “Bridging the gap between essential resources and services & community needs.”

Proposed Track A projects should bring together a science team and a U.S. community impacted by climate change for one year to co-design and implement a pilot solution that has the potential to be sustainable after the end of NSF funding. The solution must also have the potential to be scalable to other communities facing similar challanges.

The Civic Innovation Challenge (CIVIC) is designed to build a more cohesive research-to-innovation pipeline and to foster a collaborative spirit between communities and researchers. 

A CIVIC project should address community-challenges identified via a tight collaboration between civic and academic partners, with the goal of achieving concrete impacts in communities. 

The CIVIC program comprises two stages: Stage 1 Planning Grants and Stage 2 Full Awards.

Stage 1. Planning Grants (PGs). Projects funded in this design stage will provide support for a period of six months with a budget not to exceed $75,000.

Stage 2. Full Awards (FAs). Projects funded in this stage will provide support for a period of 12 months with a budget not to exceed $1,000,000. 

NSF program experts invite you to virtual office hours to answer questions about the solicitation and to learn more about what successful proposals look like.

Topic: CIVIC Solicitation
Time: Feb 15, 2024 3:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)
Join ZoomGov Meeting
https://nsf.zoomgov.com/j/1600187846?pwd=dHE5K04rSUNyN0ZVcHdGc0JBU2ZPdz09
Meeting ID: 160 018 7846
Passcode: 028637

International Collaboration

What programs have a formal collaboration with foreign countries?

NERC and BSF International Collaborative Proposals: The core programs will accept proposals for international collaborative research under two separate agreements for joint review between: 1) NSF and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and 2) NSF and the U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF). International collaborative proposals are expected to adhere to the eligibility requirements, remit, funding limits, and grant durations for the agency from which funding is sought (NSF, BSF or NERC) and must represent an integrated collaborative effort. Questions regarding these activities can be directed to NSFDEB-NERC@nsf.gov or NSFDEB-BSF@nsf.gov respectively. These agreements do not preclude other international collaborations.

International Multilateral Partnerships for Resilient Education and Science System in Ukraine (IMPRESS-U): Partnership with: Estonia: Estonian Research Council (ETAG), Latvia: Latvian Council of Science (LCS), Lithuania: Research Council of Lithuania (LMT), Poland: National Science Centre (NCN) and Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (NAWA), Ukraine: National Research Foundation of Ukraine (NRFU), USA: National Academy of Sciences (NAS), USA: Office of Naval Research Global (ONRG). The goals of the partnership initiative are to: (1) support excellence in science and engineering research, education, and innovation through international collaboration and (2) promote and catalyze integration of Ukrainian researchers in the global research community.

Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases (EEID):The focus of this program is the understanding of disease transmission dynamics through both ecological and evolutionary processes. Proposals without substantial ecological and evolutionary components will not be considered. The National Institute of Food and Agriculture of the USDA, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH, U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF), National Natural Science Foundation of China, and the UK’s Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) participate in the EEID program.  Additional information and NIH contacts can be found at: http://www.fic.nih.gov/Programs/Pages/ecology-infectious-diseases.aspx.

Biodiversity on a Changing Planet (BoCP): The Biodiversity on a Changing Planet program is a cross directorate and international program led by NSF that invites submission of interdisciplinary proposals addressing grand challenges in biodiversity science within the context of unprecedented environmental change. The program supports a comprehensive and integrative approach to understanding biodiversity from a functional perspective, and it encourages the use of new technology and team science approaches. Research supported by this program will improve modeling and forecasting of the consequences of functional change in biodiversity in response to environmental change. There are two proposal tracks covered by this program: Design and Implementation. The program supports both US-only collaborative proposals and proposals with international partnerships with the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) of Brazil, and the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa.

What programs at NSF support international collaboration?

Take a look at the Office of International Science and Engineering webpage. They list a variety of programs and solicitations that encourage international collaborations from student support to global centers.

Was there a Virtual Office Hour that provided more information on international collaborations and support?

There was! Take a look at the recap post here that includes slides and FAQs.

What if the country I’m looking to collaborate with isn’t listed in any of these resources? Or I have questions that weren’t answered anywhere!

Reach out to a Program Officer. We know this isn’t an extensive list of countries currently hosting DEB research and there may be very specific questions you need answered. We’ll work with you to figure out what is allowable in terms of providing support as well as answer any other questions you have.